queerbychoice (
queerbychoice) wrote2004-06-19 05:28 pm
Oppose LiveJournal Userpic Conformism!
You know what would make social interaction really unnecessarily complicated? Imagine if most of the hundreds of people you ever interact with (regularly, semi-regularly, intermittently or ever at all) acquired totally new faces and bodies on a weekly or monthly basis, so that the only way you could recognize or identify them at all was to look closely at the little nametag everyone was required to wear around their necks. But wait, that's not all! If that were all, at least when you met a person whose face you didn't recognize, you'd know you didn't recognize them and you'd know to look closely at the nametag around their neck. But now imagine that everybody's allowed to choose what new faces to acquire, so that every single time a new movie or TV show became popular, half the people on earth suddenly changed their faces to look like the star of it, and as soon as you thought you'd sorted out who all the people who suddenly looked like clones of the latest star were, even more new people would suddenly acquire the same face.
This is the state of social interaction on LiveJournal. I've lost count of how many times I've been looking through the old entries in someone's journal in search of a recent post I remember, only to find a different entry that I thought someone completely different had written, and a comment left by me on that entry that I had completely thought I was saying to someone entirely different. And then I go look through the old entries of that person's journal and successfully find the recent post that I had totally thought the other person had written. This results in my getting terribly confused ideas about the lives some of you are living, and in your wondering why I leave comments referring to events I seem to think happened in your life, that actually happened in the life of someone entirely different who just happens to have the same icon as you.
I can't possibly be the only person on LiveJournal who tends to notice and recognize people by their icons first. Why must everyone try to look like everyone else? I say: Ban all icon-sharing communities! If you must use an icon based on a movie, a TV show, a cartoon, a popular internet animation, or any other image that people other than you are likely to be using as icons, can't you at least choose a distinctive image of it that doesn't look exactly the same as 10,000 other LiveJournal users' icons? I think the best thing about slash is that at least when slash people make icons out of the latest movie or TV show, they actually edit the images and add text and other things that make their icons individualized. Not so with the approximately 500,000 lesbians using this as their icon (and I don't understand how any self-respecting real lesbian could want to identify herself with such a blatantly Hollywoodized soft-porn version of lesbianism as that anyway). Please, resist the urge to join the Great Conspiracy to Destroy Gayle's Sanity!
This is the state of social interaction on LiveJournal. I've lost count of how many times I've been looking through the old entries in someone's journal in search of a recent post I remember, only to find a different entry that I thought someone completely different had written, and a comment left by me on that entry that I had completely thought I was saying to someone entirely different. And then I go look through the old entries of that person's journal and successfully find the recent post that I had totally thought the other person had written. This results in my getting terribly confused ideas about the lives some of you are living, and in your wondering why I leave comments referring to events I seem to think happened in your life, that actually happened in the life of someone entirely different who just happens to have the same icon as you.
I can't possibly be the only person on LiveJournal who tends to notice and recognize people by their icons first. Why must everyone try to look like everyone else? I say: Ban all icon-sharing communities! If you must use an icon based on a movie, a TV show, a cartoon, a popular internet animation, or any other image that people other than you are likely to be using as icons, can't you at least choose a distinctive image of it that doesn't look exactly the same as 10,000 other LiveJournal users' icons? I think the best thing about slash is that at least when slash people make icons out of the latest movie or TV show, they actually edit the images and add text and other things that make their icons individualized. Not so with the approximately 500,000 lesbians using this as their icon (and I don't understand how any self-respecting real lesbian could want to identify herself with such a blatantly Hollywoodized soft-porn version of lesbianism as that anyway). Please, resist the urge to join the Great Conspiracy to Destroy Gayle's Sanity!

no subject
no subject
Of course, I'm a long time poster at Internet Infidels where avatars/icons as well as signatures aren't allowed, so I always look to the name first by internet instinct (is there such a thing?)
no subject
I think all you people just enjoy hearing me call you by the wrong name. :p
That picture bothers me too
no subject
From the looks of it,
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I am guilty of frequently changing my icons and never really representing myself in them, but at least I make my own. I wouldn't want to take someone else's avatar, and I know I get confused when people on my friendslist all have matching Orlando Bloom icons.
no subject
And you're right, I've never confused your icon with anyone else's. This is very convenient. Especially because you have the same first name as
Destroy Gayle's Sanity!
no subject
no subject
I've heard that LiveJournal originally did (in its first year or so of existence) have a page that linked to each comment you'd ever made, but they took it down because it was too hard on their servers for some reason.
no subject
I think I'm supposed to make an obligatory joke here about how you've almost "lost your marbles..." ;)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, I got an awful lot of those on my friends list too.
no subject
Re: Destroy Gayle's Sanity!
no subject
no subject
1. It's too much work
2. I'm not creative enough to come up with something that would be entertaining and witty and represent me
3. The reason in your post. It annoys me when people change their icons frequently, and I think I'm reading about someone different from who posted. I like the consistency of having one icon represent me, and to me, most posters are what their icons are.
no subject
no subject
this post is really just an excuse for us to talk about our icons. :o)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
can't get with you on this one, Gayle
The main point I'm bopping in with here, though, is that icons become icons, in a larger popular sense, because of how they catch on with a larger group. Thus, in a way, all the Amelies and Pusses in Boots are perhaps, within lj, as much a result of a spreading shared cultural admiration for what they represent as they are a reflection of such a spreading phenom. in the "real" mass media/pop culture world. I think of the more faddish cartoony icons as the lite pop version of that same thing---they just pass away quicker, like a one-hit wonder.
An icon I recently shared with
I have no icon with this comment, though, cuz it's my new default to have none. Trying it on for size. Started cuz I just couldn't pick which one I wanted, and then I noticed how it works on my actual journal's page (where a fair portion of my "readership" reads me, not being lj participants)---I have it set to show the picture used with each entry, and I realized I didn't need the default there, necessarily. Or at least it's dull/redundant when I have it there and then do several posts in a row with the default icon.
I'd just say icons function in many ways and differently in different contexts, though (granted) probably the most common way they do their job is to represent the writer on someone else's friends page.
Re: can't get with you on this one, Gayle
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
i try to keep my icons original at least somewhat...
i guess i never thought of it, because i tend to- especially lately- keep my lj contacts to a minimum...
no subject
Re: can't get with you on this one, Gayle
" I think of the more faddish cartoony icons as the lite pop version of that same thing---they just pass away quicker, like a one-hit wonder."
Yes, of course they do, and then all the same people on my friends list show up with some new identical icon to one another. They always do, it doesn't end. And I think you'd start getting distressed too if you had, like me, so many identically-iconned people on your list that you had literally had entire conversations with people and not found out until months later that the person you had been talking to was a different person than the person you had thought you were talking to. It's crazy-making, I tell you! I'm too young to feel this senile yet. I want my sanity back.
Re: can't get with you on this one, Gayle
You may consider it ideal that everyone personalize any shared icons---and I'm sure you have an idea of how much they would need to be personalized to be distinctive enough for your purpose---and, sure, I'm all for a creative world. But my focus for the time I spend at my computer has different priorities, and I can only to get so many. And some things---some ideal world thoroughly pure expression kinds of things---are just not on my radar. That's probably true for many folks around here.
You have the power to recapture your sanity: don't comment, ever, until you take a good look at that user name. (Or, hell---can one set one's journal to show NO icons?)
Re: can't get with you on this one, Gayle
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I get mad if anyone steals one of my high-frequency icons, because I do sort of feel like that would be stealing my identity. If anyone ever stole my siren, pixie, hippo, or blue raccoon, I'd throw a fit. Some of the other icons are more for moods, and if someone wants to steal one of those I usually say yes. But otherwise I get sad.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Once, a couple months ago, a whole slew of people on my friend list had the same exact icon as an "awareness" thing, and it made me crazy. At first I mistook everyone for the first person I saw with the icon, and then I just gave up and ended up with a big merged person in my head that included all of them. Gah, it was horrible.
no subject
Each of these three has a story to it. Each of these three is permanent---unless livejournal decides to allow more than three icons for unpaid users, these will remain my only icons. Each of these three is, in some way, meaningful to me.
Also, they match my journal's color scheme. Y'ever get the feeling you're putting in way, way more effort than everyone else, and no one's noticing?