queerbychoice (
queerbychoice) wrote2005-07-24 02:34 am
Dorkiness
Who else is adding a disinterests list to their LiveJournal userinfo page now that a standardized hack for it exists? I figure if I get to look at enough other people's lists, I'll eventually come up with a full 150 disinterests to put on my own list. So more of you need to go create one.
Also, I'm insulted that no one has tagged me for the Dork Meme. Actually, the reason no one has tagged me may have a lot to do with the fact that I don't think anyone I know has done the Dork Meme. But I'm going to do it anyway.
"List 5 reasons why you are a dork. And make them good reasons. Justify them. Explain them. Be loud and proud about how big of a dork you are! Then pick the 5 biggest dorks you know and have them do the meme."
1. Of the Top 250 Movies of all Time as voted by IMDB users, I've only seen five. The ones I've seen were the original three Star Wars movies, The Wizard of Oz, and Back to the Future. And I only saw the three Star Wars ones because it was impossible not to see them when my mother and brother kept watching them in the living room several hundred times in a row. I mean, the other two weren't really my idea to see either, but at least I wasn't actively trying to avoid them like I was trying to avoid the Star Wars ones.
2. However, I've seen - intentionally - every TV episode of every Star Trek series ever made.
3. Of the College Board's 101 Great Books Recommended for College-Bound Readers (which is an annoyingly sexist and racist list, but I couldn't find any non-sexist non-racist version of the "canon" without creating one myself, which would defeat the purpose of referring to it for the meme's sake), I've read 61, plus I own an additional 4 that I haven't yet read but am planning to read, plus there are 9 others where I haven't read the book named but I have read other books by the same author. This is far too high a number for me to be anything but a dork.
4. If I were ordered to Get Some Exercise, my exercise of choice would be roller skating. Anyone over the age of ten who would choose this is a certified dork.
5. The last time I had a crush on anyone I didn't meet online, or who lived within 300 miles of me, was about six years ago. Enough said.
Top 5 Dorks I Know:
(in alphabetical order, and as determined via the highly scientific method of searching for everyone I know who lists dorks, dorkiness, geeks, geekiness, nerds, nerdiness, James Joyce, math, RPGs, Star Trek, or William Shakespeare in their LiveJournal interests, and then looking at their full interests lists to sort out whose seemed dorkiest)
aesiron
becksterminator
gamesiplay
heron61
seifaiden
Also, I'm insulted that no one has tagged me for the Dork Meme. Actually, the reason no one has tagged me may have a lot to do with the fact that I don't think anyone I know has done the Dork Meme. But I'm going to do it anyway.
"List 5 reasons why you are a dork. And make them good reasons. Justify them. Explain them. Be loud and proud about how big of a dork you are! Then pick the 5 biggest dorks you know and have them do the meme."
1. Of the Top 250 Movies of all Time as voted by IMDB users, I've only seen five. The ones I've seen were the original three Star Wars movies, The Wizard of Oz, and Back to the Future. And I only saw the three Star Wars ones because it was impossible not to see them when my mother and brother kept watching them in the living room several hundred times in a row. I mean, the other two weren't really my idea to see either, but at least I wasn't actively trying to avoid them like I was trying to avoid the Star Wars ones.
2. However, I've seen - intentionally - every TV episode of every Star Trek series ever made.
3. Of the College Board's 101 Great Books Recommended for College-Bound Readers (which is an annoyingly sexist and racist list, but I couldn't find any non-sexist non-racist version of the "canon" without creating one myself, which would defeat the purpose of referring to it for the meme's sake), I've read 61, plus I own an additional 4 that I haven't yet read but am planning to read, plus there are 9 others where I haven't read the book named but I have read other books by the same author. This is far too high a number for me to be anything but a dork.
4. If I were ordered to Get Some Exercise, my exercise of choice would be roller skating. Anyone over the age of ten who would choose this is a certified dork.
5. The last time I had a crush on anyone I didn't meet online, or who lived within 300 miles of me, was about six years ago. Enough said.
Top 5 Dorks I Know:
(in alphabetical order, and as determined via the highly scientific method of searching for everyone I know who lists dorks, dorkiness, geeks, geekiness, nerds, nerdiness, James Joyce, math, RPGs, Star Trek, or William Shakespeare in their LiveJournal interests, and then looking at their full interests lists to sort out whose seemed dorkiest)

no subject
no subject
Of the books, I've read ten, which is pretty sad. Six of those were for school.
I don't exactly know what to make of that, but there it is.
no subject
no subject
I must create a pleb's reading list. Will get back to you with it.
no subject
That's it, we're not friends anymore. I'm taking half your stuff and leaving.
no subject
I'm so glad, also, that there is someone else in the world who is not ashamed of not having seen a lot of movies.
no subject
I'm not sure I like the fact that it would be the first list that appears on the userinfo page, ahead of one's interests, lj friends and communities, which tend to define one in a somewhat more positive manner. But then I don't see why I, of all people, should be objecting to defining oneself in terms of what one is not.
3. Of the College Board's 101 Great Books Recommended for College-Bound Readers ... I've read 61, plus I own an additional 4 that I haven't yet read but am planning to read, plus there are 9 others where I haven't read the book named but I have read other books by the same author.
I seem to have read a horrifying number of them. But what is perhaps more interesting is that, of these, I had read most of them before I was 13 or 14. (I must've been absolutely nuts, but never mind.) After that, the rate at which I read books on that list dipped drastically, to the point that the only reason I read any of the books on the list was when it was required reading on some course or other. Although it is very true that I simply don't have the time or energy now to keep up with my previously furious rate of reading, the reason for that particular trend was that an overwhelming majority of the books I voluntarily read simply aren't on that list.
no subject
2. I could only think of one disinterest to list right now, and it's 'excessively negative people'. Bonus points if you can get the reference.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think what this means is that you need to lengthen your LJ interests list. It was too short to adequately prove your dorkiness in my eyes.
no subject
no subject
When I was 14 I'd read only 12 of the books, and 10 of them were for school. By the end of high school I'd read 26 of them, but 22 of them were for school. Most of the books I read on my own are ones I read later - in large part because my middle school and high school had piled so much homework on me that I had no time left to read anything for pleasure, whereas when I was in college I did have time, and after I graduated I also had time.
no subject
no subject
*pause*
Calvin: "Wait a minute."
no subject
What's Lobachevskian geometry?
no subject
no subject
In general Lobachevskian geometry is a non-Euclidean form of geometry which rejects the idea of the parallel postulate, which, consequently, throws off the entire logic of the system. I am a Lit major and math-stupid, so I can't explain it like a good mathematician could, but it's kind of like someone deciding that the whole round thing doesn't work for them and we'd all be better off with square wheels. But I'm a sucker for lost causes.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I went to the IMDB list, and have seen all but 26 of the top 100 movies, and have seen all but 78 of the remaining 150. I think I'll at least have to try to see the rest of the top 100 movies, and a lot of the movies on the rest of the list look quite good, too. I think I have a lot of Igmar Bergman and Stanley Kubrick movies to see. Apparently my father neglected those when he (a huge movie buff) gave me my "movie education."
I've only read 20 of the books on the great books list, and 11 of those were read for school, so I imagine you'll believe that my schools were highly negligent in that respect, though I think my teachers may have just been better about exposing us to literature that was off the beaten path, and perhaps came from a more diverse selection of authors. There are about three more on the list that I have started, but not ever finished, and one on the list that I own, and am planning to read, but haven't started.
no subject
Literature off the beaten path is good. My schools did not much go in for it, and when they did make some efforts at it, they tended unfortunately to choose rather mediocre literature that was off the beaten path, thus giving the mistaken impression that all literature off the beaten path was mediocre. I've been trying to fill in these gaps in my reading ever since.
no subject
no subject
A real-life example would be the geometry you have to use to navigate the surface of the Earth. Start parallel lines on the surface of a sphere and make them straight and they'll eventually hit.
no subject
No - just a very bored and easily distracted one. Some of them I read as a wager with my English teacher, who didn't believe I could - or would - get through unabridged versions of the books.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
This is proving to be a good way to let off some steam...
no subject
17 people list hyperbolic geometry as an interest, as do three communities. You're just the only one to use that name.
Also, it's not a matter of rejecting a postulate, but rather assigning a property (like sectional curvature of -1) that messes with other things, such as the number of unique lines passing through a point not on your initial line. It just seems that way because of how your geodesics in Euclidean space happen to be straight lines.
It's not a lost cause by any stretch. It's just something you don't normally learn as an undergraduate.
I could be totally wrong on this, though. I'm fairly new to differential geometry.
no subject