queerbychoice: (Default)
queerbychoice ([personal profile] queerbychoice) wrote2004-08-17 07:45 pm

[identity profile] jet.livejournal.com 2004-08-18 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
related to your poll is a post in academics_anon asking for people to participate in a questionnaire on affirmative action and racial attitudes of college students.

http://www.livejournal.com/community/academics_anon/526754.html

[identity profile] joxn.livejournal.com 2004-08-18 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
Confidential to [livejournal.com profile] cheeser1: Yes, but did they use three, or four nails (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triclavian_heresy)?

[identity profile] interjections.livejournal.com 2004-08-19 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
You come up with the best polls :P

(Anonymous) 2004-08-20 07:59 am (UTC)(link)
Just..wondering

race rhetoric

[identity profile] eviltelepath81.livejournal.com 2004-08-21 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
Quotas haven't been legal in the U.S. for about a decade, at least. I got into an argument with a person in a cafe about it a month ago who was (mis)explaining affirmative action to a bunch of international students. The Right (and moderate Left) just go on and on about quotas to this day just to bring up an influential & unpopular phantom in front of people without mentioning that there aren't any quotas anymore.

Re: race rhetoric

[identity profile] queerbychoice.livejournal.com 2004-08-21 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly, I think they should use quotas. Sure, there needs to be some leeway and standard deviation and stuff, but if set up loosely enough, I think quotas serve an important purpose. Which now isn't being served anymore.

Re: race rhetoric

[identity profile] eviltelepath81.livejournal.com 2004-08-22 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I could never really think of a srong case for why there shouldn't be quotas. I haven't thought about it in a long time. It's definitely easier to persuade people to support points systems affirmative action than quotas though (not that that makes points systems the correct course of action).