queerbychoice: (Default)
queerbychoice ([personal profile] queerbychoice) wrote2004-10-13 06:26 pm

Emotional Outburst While Watching the Presidential Debate

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggggghhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The stupid fucking homophobic heterosexual white male Christian so-called representatives of mine in the stupidest fucking so-called debate just would have to go and bring up the "Is homosexuality a choice?" idiocy. AS THOUGH THAT'S RELEVANT TO WHETHER WE DESERVE ANY RIGHTS. AS THOUGH TWO HETEROSEXUAL CHRISTIANS ARE IN ANY POSITION TO EVEN TRY TO SPEAK FOR ALL THE QUEERS OF THE WORLD.

Not only do I not want either one of them in charge of my country, I want them both fucking deported from it for making such a ridiculous mess of the entire election campaign. Somebody appoint me dictator on the grounds that my campaign pledge is to deport them both. Bush will be deported to a prison to be prosecuted for war crimes. Kerry can just be deported to someplace where I never have to hear about him again.

[identity profile] queerbychoice.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
Except the atheists. And the agnostics. And the people who don't believe in a single primary deity who they address as "God."

[identity profile] brienf.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but the unbelievers can abort pregnancies b/c Kerry won't push his religious beliefs onto other people. This is why he supports gay marriage. [cough]

[identity profile] queerbychoice.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
"I pledge to only push my religious beliefs onto people when it's politically advantageous to do so!" probably wouldn't make a great campaign slogan.

[identity profile] brienf.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
It wouldn't help the wishy-washy image that Republicans keep using for him.

[identity profile] queerbychoice.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
And oh my nonexistent goddess, could Bush POSSIBLY have more ridiculously blatantly have totally AVOIDED answering the question about whether he wants Roe v. Wade overturned????

[identity profile] cukoo4cocopuffs.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:05 am (UTC)(link)
He coulda pulled a bunny out from under the ledger and said "look at the bunny. Look at the bunny."
He's an evil evil man.
Oh yeah, I was gonna say Andrew Jackson once said that the electoral college in deciding the President would only produce an evil outcome. ....... yeah.

[identity profile] theobscure.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
"He coulda pulled a bunny out from under the ledger and said 'look at the bunny. Look at the bunny.'"

Ahahah. Somehow, I wouldn't be at all surprised if that happened.

[identity profile] brienf.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
I was surprised that he avoided it, given the Dred Scott reference from last week.

[identity profile] queerbychoice.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, but the Dred Scott reference was in carefully veiled code language so that only anti-abortion people would know what the hell he was trying to say. The rest of us would rather more logically conclude that if there's any parallel between slavery and abortion rights, it's not that fetuses with barely any brain cells are slaves, but rather that women being forced to spend nine months carrying around and feeding babies with their uteruses 24 hours a day are slaves.

[identity profile] brienf.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
True.

[identity profile] legolastn.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
"I will appoint judges who interpret the Constitution."

As opposed to what? Judges who WON'T interpret the Constitution? (he meant strictly)

But what really got my goat was after Kerry's answer he had the audacity to say Kerry clearly would use a litmus test (as if he would not).

[identity profile] en-ki.livejournal.com 2004-10-14 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
He means he'll appoint judges like Scalia, who will interpret the Constitution in accord with 19th-century social mores, rather than judges who might interpret it in accord with modern social mores or (God forbid!) 18th-century political ideals.

[identity profile] arctangent.livejournal.com 2004-10-27 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
You can still be one of God's children if you don't believe in God. Just like you can be a product of biological evolution even if you don't believe in it.